Sarah Carr writes for The Mental Elf:
Just over a decade ago, a research study of rural mental health services in the north Midlands of the UK, recognised the importance of community mental health services and workers operating in a sensitive, non-stigmatising way (Crawford and Brown, 2002). The study made the connection between mental health stigma and service use. The authors described mental health stigma as traditionally being:
…seen as something that is the fault of the mental health system, and that involves an individual suffering social disapprobation and reduced life chances as a result of having been given a diagnostic label and an identity as a patient as a result of their contact with psychiatric institutions. (Crawford & Brown 2002 p229)
In a recent Mental Elf blog, Nikki Newhouse covered research from the Mental Health Commission of Canada that suggested that the stigma of mental illness is a barrier to care and help seeking. In the research, people with mental health problems said that at times ‘the stigma is worse than the illness’. Nikki mentioned the study summarised in this blog, which further explores the associations between the stigma of mental illness and people seeking help for their mental health problems. This study is the first systematic review of research looking at the impact of mental health stigma on help-seeking behaviour. The authors aimed to investigate the following questions:
- What is the size and direction of the association between stigma and help-seeking?
- To what extent is stigma identified as a barrier to help-seeking?
- What processes underlie the relationship between stigma and help-seeking?
- Are there population groups for which stigma disproportionately deters help-seeking?
They focused on help seeking from formal mental health services in the healthcare sector and from talking therapy services.
Five electronic databases (Medline, EMBASE, Sociological Abstracts, PsychInfo and CINAHL) were searched for studies and reviews on associations between stigma and help-seeking, dating from 1980 until 2011. There were no language restrictions in the searching. Following screening, 144 studies were included in the review. Three main types of literature were identified:
- Quantitative association studies, giving statistical data the relationship between measurements of stigma and help-seeking
- Quantitative barrier studies, giving data on the proportion of participants experiencing stigma-related barriers to help-seeking
- Qualitative process studies, giving analyses of interviews, focus groups or observational studies about stigma and help-seeking
Studies on structural stigma, such as lower funding and status accorded to mental health services or negative media stereotypes were not included.
The majority of studies (69%) were undertaken in US or Canada, with 20 being conducted in Europe; 10 in Australia and New Zealand; 8 in Asia and 1 in South America. 21% of the studies were on students in higher education. The included studies were judged to be of methodologically mixed quality. Using key themes from the qualitative process studies, the authors constructed a conceptual model showing the relationship between the processes contributing to and counteracting the effects of stigma on help-seeking behaviour. The five major themes were:
- Dissonance between a person’s preferred self-identity or social identity and common stereotypes about mental health
- Anticipation/experience of negative consequences
- Need/preference for non-disclosure
- Stigma-related strategies used by individuals to enable help-seeking
- Stigma-related aspects of care that facilitate help-seeking
Notable sub-themes included ‘stigma for family’ for people from black and minority ethnic communities and ‘fear of psychiatric patients’, a barrier-related theme arising from the quantitative studies. Overall, the systematic review yielded these main findings:
- “Stigma was the fourth highest ranked barrier to help seeking [out of ten], with disclosure concerns the most commonly reported stigma barrier”
- “Ethnic minorities, youth, men, those in the military and health professionals were disproportionately deterred by stigma”
- “Stigma had a moderate effect on help-seeking compared to other types of barrier”
The authors also noted that seeking help from mental health services could be stigmatising and highlighted the negative effects of internalised stigma, or feelings of shame about having a mental health problem.
The review authors conclude that:
Stigma has a small- to moderate-sized negative effect on help seeking. Review findings can be used to help inform the design of interventions to increase help-seeking.
For applying this research evidence in practice, they recommend that for interventions to improve access to mental health care and support:
multiple different types and aspects of stigma contribute to this effect, consequently multi-faceted approaches are likely to be most productive.
To read the rest of the article, and a summing up, follow this link